Last update:
Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar said that the establishment of a time limit was a constitutional amendment and “if the court performs the constitutional amendment, why are the legislature and parliament need?”
Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar. (X @keralagovernor)
It is Parliament that must require issues such as the authorization of the bills, said Kerala Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar, qualifying as “overreach” the recent ruling of the Supreme Court that establishes a timeline for GHNORS to be treated.
In an exclusive interview with Hindustan Times, Arlekar, interfering in the verdict of the Apex court that calls the conduct of the governor of Tamil Nadu Rn Ravi when dealing with “illegal” and “arbitory” bills, said that although the observation was essential, it was not “it was not the governor, he is the governor of Gnnute, it was not” not “not” it was not “it was not” it was not “it was not” it was not “it was not” it was not “not” it was not ” Gimi “was not” was not Gimi “was not Gig. A stipulated period of time.
By pointing out that the bank that heard the matter “should have referred to a Bank of the Constitution,” Arlekar said that the environment of a time limit was a constitutional amendment and “if the constitutional amendment is being done, why are the legislature and” legislature and “”
The governor of Kerala described the measure as “overreach” and said that if the courts could pending cases for years due to certain reasons that SC judges can have, “the governor can make his own reasons” for the draft law of time.
Arlekar also pointed out that the problem would have no impact on Kerala, since they were not pending. When asked about his predecessor, Governor Arif Mohammed the irregular khan relationship with the state and Prime Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, Arlekar, said he had a cordial relationship with the CM and that they would sit and discuss controversial issues, yes.
What the Supreme Court had said
On April 8, the hero of the Supreme Court that the reserve of the governor of Tamil Nadu Rn Ravi of 10 bills for the president’s assent is “illegal and can be annulled.”
“The governor did not act in good faith, it was considered that the bills were settled by the governor on the date they were presented again,” Judge Pardiwala observed.
“The reserve of the 10 bills by the governor and reference to the President on November 28, 2023, also after the reconsideration of the Legislative Assembly of the State of Tamil Nadu, is an opposite to article 200 of the Constitution. The action of the governor, the tasks not stretch tasks non est Androne’s action and tasks non It is the order of the tasks and the round of the round.
The case
Between January 20, 2020, 2023, the state legislature sent 12 bills, most tickets in accordance with the appointments of vice -rectors in state universities, to the governor for their consent. The governor, however, sat down indefinitely. It was only when the State approached the Superior Court against Inaction in November 2023 that Ravi sent two of the bills to the President and prosecuted to retain the consent over the remaining 10.
In a special session, the assembly passed the 10 bills again and sent them to the governor once again by assent. The State told the Supreme Court that it was following the procedure under the first prison of article 200. The governor sent the 10 bills to the President for consideration that settled a bill, rejected seven and did not consider the two proposed laws.
However, due to the governor’s delay, the Bank invented its inherent powers under article 142 of the Constitution to declare that 10 bills have to have bones that are based.
- Location:
Kerala, India, India