Last update:
An order of provisional stay of the Supreme Court on a law, which is the largest initiative of the Government of Modi 3.0, would have shameful. And the law, in any case, was not implemented immediately since the rules had not yet framed or notified
Almost all the great opposition parties have transferred to the Court of Apex against the new WAQF law. (Image of representation: PTI)
On the second day of the hearing of the Supreme Court of the challenge of the WAQF law, the central government touched a decisive step. The General of Platreator, Tushar Mehta, initial argued against any position or provisional order based on the Prima Facie opinion by the bank led by the President of the Supreme Court of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna. But as the Superior Court observed on “not changing things drastically, until the matter is decided”, it was clear how the hearing was processed.
The provisional order of the Supreme Court to propose on Wednesday made it clear that the CJI LED was concerned about the unregistered delegitimization “WAQF by the user” and allowing non -Muslims at the WAQF Board. On Thursday, Tushar Mehta said that the government, by itself, was ensuring that: 1) No change will be presented in next week 2) “WAQF for the user”, registered or not registered, will continue to be valid for next week at least, and 3) the state governments will not make any recommendation to constitute a new WAQF Board or Council.
The suo motorcycle retreated by the Government was soon interpreted as a victory for the petitioners. Asaduddin Owaisi of Aimim said that the thought of opposing the entire law, the three points recorded by the presentations of the SS government in Thorsday were, in effect, a suspension of the Apex court. Amanatullah Khan also interpreted the procedure as the “defeat of the divisive policy of BJP”.
The government, however, sees the procedures differently. An order of provisional stay of the Supreme Court on a law, which is the largest initiative of the Government of Modi 3.0, would have shameful. The opposition leaders such as Mahua Moitra of the Trinamool Congress were already claiming the claim after the SC proposed the interim order. Hiring suo motorcycle was a more honorable option for the government. The law, in any case, was not implemented immediately since the rules had not framed or notified in the legs yet. For the citizenship amendment law, the government took its time to notify the rules. The rules of the CAA were notified four years after Parliament approved the law. By then, Shaheen Bagh’s protest sites had been emptied, the temperature cooled and “misinformation about the act that tries to remove citizenship” deny.
For WAQF too, the government could be willing to wait. Some of the provisions of the original bill were changed after allies such as TDP and JD (U) suggested changes in the JPC Parliamentary Committee (JPC). The Government has the hope that the Apex court can convince the need for WAQF’s law to eliminate the anomalies that have been created. The fact that the SC observed that some “WAQF by the user” in fact was an abuse of the standards (Delhi HC Land Bee affirmed how Waq Country) is also poster.
All eyes now in the next chapter of the WAQF episode. On May 5, only eight days before the president of the Supreme Court Khanna is ready to dismantle the position and deliver it to his successor, Judge Br Gavai, the government is expected to present his response, defending the legal provisions related to the “WAQF user user user”, tea! In WAQF boards, and the role of the collector or designated officer.