Last update:
The historian Vikram Sampath said: “We must not bleach the story to adapt to our present with the warning that we are not holding the communities today for the communities of the barbarians of the past, the teyes glorified them.”
(Left) Sanjeev Sanyal, historian and economist, and historian Vikram Sampath at Rising Bharat Summit 2025, in New Delhi on Wednesday.
Sanjeev Sanyal, historian and economist, are dedicated to the controversy of Aurengzeb at the growing summit of Bharat 2025 of CNN-News18 on Wednesday, and said it is a historical fact that Emperor Mogol Aurangzeb to a large number of masses. “If we don’t feel comfortable with the truth, then it will always be stirred.”
Another Fellow history at rising bharat summit 2025, vikram sampath, -Shald -Shald -Shald -Shald -Shald -Shald -Shald -Shald -Shald -Shald -Shald -Shald -Shald -SOULDYS ”.
Aurengzeb’s controversy was when the Samajwadi party leader Abu Azmi, praised Emperor Mogol in the Maharashtra assembly for his “good administration” and that India was a “golden bird” of his era in the midst of the liberation of “Chhaava” Hindi. Later, the violent clashes exploded in Nagpur about the demands of eliminating the tomb of Aurengzeb in Khuldabad, in Sambhaji Nagar, Maharashtra.
Sanyal said that “Pakistan named his missiles after Ghazni and Ghori. That is what happens when you glorify the barbarians of the past.”
When asked why the government is reviewing the story, Sampath said: “Revisionism is not a bad word. Each generation looks back in time. History is about having a constant dialogue with the past. We have a terrible tendency to go through the carpet.”
He also said: “History sacrifices a cure space for communities. Modern society needs to deal with this. As a historian, we are not trapped in the past. We need to make peace with him and not underground.”
Sanyal talked about why Hinduism is not monolithic. “This is diversity. There are many opinions in history, I have no problem with different perspectives of history.”
“The problem is when there is no agreement on the basic facts. But I understand that the Bengali vision of history may not be the same as the kannada vision of history,” said Sanyal.