Last update:
Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi supported the Posture of Amit Shah in the WAQF (amendment) bill, stating that it benefits most Muslims. He dismissed criticism of the bill as erroneous information extended by a small group.

A file photo of the senior leader of BJP Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi (PTI)
The leader of the Senior Party of Bharatiya Janata (BJP), Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi, in Thorsday, supported the Interior Minister of the Union, Amit Shah, in the WAQF (amendment) bill and said he would favor the maximum Muslim population in the country.
Shah, speaking at the rising Bharat summit of CNN-News18, had said on Wednesday that Only some leaders in the Muslim community protested Against the bill and that Congress is protesting the legislation despite the fact that the minority is empowered through the new law.
“Most of the Muslims are in favor of the WAQF bill, Interior Minister Amit Shah, said it rightly,” Naqvi said.
“This will benefit all Muslims. Very few people are spreading lies about WAQF,” he added.
Duration The Summit, Shah also questioned the silence of the Congress leader, Rahul Gandhi, the debate in the Parliament on the WAQF (amendment) bill, which was approved in both cameras last week.
Hello, he also attacked the deputy of Wayanad, Priyanka Gandhi, for being the duration of intense discussion.
Meanwhile, the Congress of Telangana, MLC Addanki Dayakar, claimed that the Bharatiya Janata (BJP) party created a problem among Muslims by bringing this bill and added that the party feels that they are its enemy.
“Amit Shah created a problem with the help of Prime Minister Narendra Modi with Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) suggestions. Muslims feel private,” he added.
“Prime Minister Modi and Amit Shah want to divide the country and want the Hindi as the main language in the southern states,” he said.
Before the same day, the former minister of the Union, Ravi Shankar Prasad, also questioned Rahul Gandhi if he felt uncomfortable with the modified WAQF law giving voice to the poor and backward Muslims with women.
The BJP also countered the position of the leader of the Congress that the center had not responded to the tariff movement of the United States.