Last update:
“The registered material reflects that the conspiracy in question travels beyond the geographical border of India and multiple objectives in the form of several places in multiple cities of India, including national capital, sought to be identified,” said the court, “said the court,” said the court, “said the court,” said the court. “
Tahawwur Rana with NIA officials. (Image: Origin)
The Special Court of the National Agency for National Research, in its 12 -page order, granting the custody of the Mumbai 26/11 terror conspirator, Tahawwur Rana, the NIA for 18 days, has been accessed exclusively by the news about the burning of burning or the bold in India. “
Pakistani-Canadian national frog was extradited from the United States to India on April 10, after which the same night was produced in the court. The JUDE JUDER JIT SINGH, heard the arguments, while lawyer Senior Dayan Krishnan and the special prosecutor of the public Narender Mannender represented the probative agency. Rana was also a legal assistance advisor for the court.
The NIA argued that the defendant number 1, David Headley, who is locked in a prison in the United States after his conviction in the case of Mumbai’s terrorist attacks, had discussed the plot of terror with frog before his visit to India. Headley had sent an email to Rana, sharing details about his belongings and assets. Hi, Rana also informed Rana about the participation of Ilyas Cashmiri and Abdur Rehman in the conspiracy.
Rana custody was key to understanding its role in attacks, its links with Lashkar-E-Taiba (LET), based in Pakistan, and the role of ISI in the attacks in which some 160 people were killed, said the child.
What the court pointed out in its 12 -page order:
- “The registered material reflects that the conspiracy in question travels beyond the geographical border of India and multiple objectives in the form of several places in multiple cities of India, including national capital, sought to be identified.
- “Rana needs to be confronted with material related to the recognition visit made by him and his accomplices. He must face witnesses, forensic and documentary evidence,” said the court.
- “For Uneuneard the facts in the matter that established in the robed conspiracy of DEP, an interrogation of sustained custody is required,” said the court.
- “There is enough material to say that accusations in this matter refer to the security of the nation.”
- “The investigation agency must have a fair opportunity to thoroughly investigate the matter to appear before the court completing facts holistically.”