Close Menu
  • Home
  • India
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • CEO
    • Economy
    • Realtor
  • Entertainment
  • Festivals
  • Health
  • LifeStyle
    • Education
    • Technology
  • Sports
    • Coach
Indian News: Breaking Stories and TrendsIndian News: Breaking Stories and Trends
Monday, June 9
  • Home
  • India
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • CEO
    • Economy
    • Realtor
  • Entertainment
  • Festivals
  • Health
  • LifeStyle
    • Education
    • Technology
  • Sports
    • Coach
Indian News: Breaking Stories and TrendsIndian News: Breaking Stories and Trends
Home » Blog » Allahabad HC Denies Police Protection To Couple Marrying Against Parents’ Wish

Allahabad HC Denies Police Protection To Couple Marrying Against Parents’ Wish

Neha MalhotraBy Neha Malhotra India
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Last update:April 17, 2025, 7:18 am isth

The observation of the Court occurred while listening to a statement filed by a Shreya Kesarwani and her husband who sought security and a court order against private respondents who disturb their peaceful marriage life.

Superior Court of Allahabad (News18 Hindi)

Superior Court of Allahabad (News18 Hindi)

The Superior Court of Allahabad ruled that couples who marry the wishes of their parents cannot seek police protection as a matter of law unless there is a real threat to their life and freedom. He also observed that the courts should not “provide protection to those who simply fled to marry according to their own wishes.”

The observation of the Superior Court of Allahabad occurred while listening to a statement filed by a couple who sought protection. The court mentioned that security can be caused in “deserving” cases but not in the absence of any perception of threats. In such cases, the couple must “learn to support each other and face society,” the court said.

Shreya Kesarwani and her husband presented a petition in the court that sought security and a court order against private respondents who disturb their life from Casados ​​Pacífico.

“There is no requirement of passing any Order for providing police protection to them in the light of the Judge Reded By the Supreme Court in the case of can Singh vs state of up and annother, where they have ‘bone is not Mepthe Haythe Haven’s Are Haven’s Haven Haven Haveny Haven Haven Haven Haven Haven Haven Haven Haven Haven Haven Haven Haven Haven Haven Haven Haven Haven has HAVING HAVENY HAVENY HAVENY HAVENY HAVENY HAVENY HAVENY HAVENY HAVENY HAVENY HAVENY HAVENY HAVEN THAT THE HAVEN’S HECKS HAVENY HAVENY HAVEN THAT THE HAVEN’S HECKS HAVENS HAVEN’S HAVEN’S HAVEN HAVENS HAVEN TO Haven’s Have’s Have’s Have’s Have’s Haven Haven Haven Have’s Have’s Have Have’s Have Adess according to his own wishes, “Judge Saurabh Srivastava observed.

“There is not even an evidence iota to evince that private respondents (relations of any of the petitioners) probably cause a physical or mental assault on the petitioners,” the court.

    Location:

    Allahabad, India, India

India news Allahabad HC denies police protection so that couples marry the parents’ desire

Keep Reading

A go-to place for expertise on autism spectrum disorder

Kalaburagi aiming for greener future with mass sapling drive

Trump promises to hike steel, aluminium tariffs to 50%

Newly formed taluks will get Praja Soudhas as government-sanctioned administrative approvals

NCLAT grants interim stay on NCLT order rejecting Vedanta’s demerger proposal

India says Maoist rebel chief killed in ‘breakthrough’ blow

India

  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Festivals
  • Health
  • Technology

Business

  • CEO
  • Economy
  • Realtor

Lifestyle

  • Education
  • Sports
  • Coach
  • Politics
©2017-2025 Indianupdates All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.