Last update:
The center can approach the Supreme Court to review its ruling that establishes deadlines for the President and the governors to decide on the state law.
Supreme Court of India. (File photo/PTI)
It is likely that the center approaches the Supreme Court that urges him to review his judgment of establishing a deadline for the president and the governors to decide on the consent of the bills approved by the state legislatures.
The news agency PTI cited the sources saying that the bears seeking a review of the timeline, the government can seek a review of the order of the APEX court that state governments can directly address it if the president retains a draft drain.
Meanwhile, the reasons in which the request for review will be presented and will be known once the government will approach the Apex court will be considered.
If the Government is approaching the Supreme Court, the request for review must be presented before the same bank of JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan who pronounced the verdict, the report said.
After the ruling of April 8, the government of Tamil Nadu notified 10 pending bills as acts in the Government Gazette, citing the ruling of the Supreme Court that it was “considered” that they resorted to Aserte.
In its order, the Supreme Court has prescribed that the President must decide on the bills reserved for his consideration by the governor within three months from the date that said reference is received.
This was sum to the wink of the Court greater than the 10 bills, which were stagnant and reserved by the governor of Tamil Nadu, RN Ravi, for the president’s consideration.
The court established a schedule of one month for all governors to act on the bills approved by the state assemblies, in accordance with the sentence found in 415 pages and went up on the website of the Apex court on Friday night.
