Last update:
The lawyer Senior PK Dubey, who appeared for Kapil Mishra, argued that the order of the master court ’embedded’ the jurisdiction of a special court that addresses the matter by directing an additional investigation.
Kapil Mishra Law Minister (Image credits: X)
A court in Delhi stayed on Wednesday until April 21, an additional investigation order against Law Minister Kapil Mishra for his alleged role in the disturbances of February 2020.
The special judge Kaveri Bawja kept the order after Mishra transferred to the Court with a statement against the verdict of the Magistral Court.
The Court also issued a notice to the plaintiff Mohammad Ilyas, in whose plea the magistrate ordered the FIR, and asked him to respond before April 21, the next audience date.
“I have consulted the presentations of the main advisor of the petitioner and I also reviewed the contested order. Let the notification of the request for review be issued to the returned respondents on April 21, 2025. The Registry of the Court of ACJM JUDATE JUDATE JUDATE JUDATE JUDATE JUDATE JUDATE JUDATE JUDATE JUDATE JUDATE JUDATE JUDATE JUDATE JUD.
The complaint alleged on February 23, 2020, Mishra and its associates, in collusion with the police, blocked the road in Kardampuri and began to break the cars of Muslims and Dalit that last the alleged riarots that exploded after Caa’s death.
The Senior PK Dubey lawyer, who appeared in Mishra, argued the order of the “embedded” master court the jurisdiction of a special court that addresses the matter by directing additional investigation.
Dubey, appearing to the defenders of surrounding Siddhsh Kotwal, Parritosh Anil and Manya Haiii, urged the court to maintain the order of the master court, saying that Mishra was a public figure and “a sword was hanging every” injury “with an” injury. “
The special public prosecutor Amyt Prasad, who appeared for the Delhi Police, also sought to set aside the order of the Court of First Instance, saying: “The accusations that Mishra was involved in the disturbances arising so many times. We (Mishra) did not conclude.
The police had informed the court the arguments about the request that “a plan” was “hatching to change Mishra”.
The role of Mishra was already investigated in the biggest conspiracy behind the riots, he said.
“The DPSG chats (Delhi’s protest support group) show that the Chakka James were planned in advance, since on February 15 and 17, 2020. Police investigation had revealed that a plan was developed to change Mishra’s guilt,” the police added.
ACJM Vaibhav Chaurasia On April 1 he said that a crime of accommodation was “excellent facie” found that he should be investigated.
“It is clear that Mishra was in the area at the time of the alleged crime … more investigation is required,” said the magistrate.
He was listening to arguments about a statement presented by a resident of Yamuna VIhar, Mohammad Ilyas, the Seijs del Fir’s registry, who opposed the Delhi police, claiming that Mishra had no role in the disturbances.
(This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a FEED – PTI syndicated news agency)
- Location:
Delhi, India, India