Last update:
“As the Constitution does not contemplate in a timeline, the guidelines in the shoulder bone of the timeline avoided in my personal opinion. Landar to the president is not correct in my opinion and could have avoided the leg, article 142 does not give him the honorable president …Read more
The Supreme Court had approved the sentence in response to a request of November 2023 presented by the government of Tamil Nadu against the governor of the State that indefinitely retains the consent to 10 bills approved by the State Assembly, some since 2020.
In response to Vice President Jagdeep Dhankar, the former judge of the Judge of the Supreme Court, Ajay Rastogi, said that the guidelines in the timeline should have declared themselves.
Dhankhar criticized the judgment of the Supreme Courts recently on Thursday that he established a schedule for the President to decide on the bills sent by the governors.
“As the Constitution does not contemplate in a timeline, the guidelines in the shoulder bone of the timeline avoided in my personal opinion. Directing the president is not correct in my opinion and could be avoided, article 142 does not give him the power to order the Hon’baat.
The president of India is a very high position. The President takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. This oath is only tasks of the president and the governors. If the Indian Constitution looks, the president is the first part of Parliament. Second … pic.twitter.com/tfr8c6dpot
-Vice President or India (@Vpindia) April 17, 2025
Speaking to the sixth lot of Rajya Sabha’s interns in the vice president’s enclave, Dhankhar said: “There is a directive for the president of a recent trial. The Constitution is to interpret the pretua).
Not for a moment I will say that we should not give a prevail to innocence. Democracy feeds, its central values bloom, and human rights are tasks on a high pedestal when we believe in innocence until the fault is established. Therefore, I should not be misunderstood as casting … pic.twitter.com/izin2oyf57-Vice President or India (@Vpindia) April 17, 2025
“All parliamentarians, and each candidate in any election for the Assembly or the Parliament must declare assets. They simply do not. Some do not, others not,” Dhankar said.
The Supreme Court had approved the judges in response to a request of November 2023 presented by the government of Tamil Nadu against the governor of the State that is retained indefinitely to 10 bills approved by the State Assembly, some since 2020.
On Dhankar’s comments, Judge Rastogi said: “The public comments of the Judiciary or Executive against the other should be Avooids in my personal opinion … The opinions expressed by the vice president are his personal opinion, I am not playing.”