Last update:
The former CJI Chandrachud emphasized that the law is a commitment to public and social service, aimed at the rights to carry out social transformation. He pointed out that while AI can never replace human compassion.
Former President of the Supreme Court of India Dy Chandrachud at the Bharat Summit on the rise of CNN-NEWS18
The law means a commitment to the public and social service, the former president of the Supreme Court of India Dy Chandrachud said Wednesday.
Speaking at the growing Bharat summit of CNN-News18, the old CJI, when asked about his advice for young people who aspire to join the law in a profession, that the essence of the law is to carry out their rights.
Also talking about the relevance of artificial intelligence, and if you could replace lawyers in the future, the former CJI said that if there is something that AI cannot replace is compassion, a sense of love for dignity.
“The most important thing about the law is that it means a commitment to public service, the law has to do with social service. The essence of the law is to realize the rights to bring a broader social transformation,” said Chandrachud.
“Ask me about the AI, if I would take the place of lawyers and the possible judges, well, there is much that the AI can do, but there is one thing that the AI cannot replace, and that is compassion, a sense of love, a sense of table, dignity and that added and that added and that added and that added and that added” added “, he added”, “he added,” and that.
What the former CJI said on the reforms in the Judiciary
In the event, the former CJI said that one should never make decisions that are reactionary, but all of which benefit the nation as a whole.
“When you have a problem in your hand, try it and allow dust to settle. And then make decisions that are of interest to the institution and the nation. Never make decisions at the act, they may not be considered well or,” he said.
Answering a question about reforms in the Judiciary, Chandrachud said: “It must take place at the lowest level. The government is the largest litigant, and I think the litigation policy has to withdraw.
Chandrachud comments on the judges who make the statement of assets public
In reference to the relevant case to the judge of the Judge of the Superior Court of Delhi, Yashwant Varma, the former CJI said that the Supreme Court had long approved a resolution that all the judges, including the main justices of doustosis, purpose, chartossese, chartososa of purpose, Potrone Chartosest Chartos.
However, when these statements must be charged on the website, the judges must be left, he said.
“Since 2009, there was a resolution that all judges had to declare their assets. The resolution that was approved by the Supreme Court of India was the declaration of assets by the judges, including the main judges of India, it is mandatory. If these should be put on the website, they should be left to the individual judge,” said Chandrachud.
“Does the load detail load on the website serve the purpose of transparency?” Hello Ash.
“I fully understand and support the decision on the declaration of assets, but to what extent it must have transparency, it is an important question,” he said.
(A large cash battery was found in the official duration of the Varma residence, a fire incident on the night of March 14).
The Bharat Summit 2025 ascent celebrates the power of the youth of India as the driving force on the trip to a Vksit Bharat for 2047.