MHA is the Nodal Ministry for the processing and transmission of a final decision through the president of India with respect to state laws. Archive. | Photo credit: PTI
It is likely that the Ministry of Affairs of the Interior of the Union (MHA) presents a request for review against the Judgment of April 8 of the Supreme Court that allows judicial intervention if the governors retain the assent of the legislative law for too long. He also prescribed a three -month timeline for the president to decide on the bills referred to by the governor.
A senior government official said The Hindu That a petition was preparing against the sentence, which establishes defined deadlines for the governors and the president.
Also read | Governor of Tamil Nadu: Authorities occupying high offices must be guided by constitution values, says the Supreme Court
The SC judgment occurred in response to a request of November 2023 presented by the Government of Tamil Nadu against the state governor that indefinitely retains the assent to ten bills approved by the State Assembly, some since 2020.
‘Bill should have expired
A second government official said that the review was necessary since the center points were not reflected with sufficient duration of the arguments in the case.
“The Judgment Paves The Way for Restoring A ‘Lapsed’ Bill. Per The Constitution, eleven the billion been return, or assent to it withheld by the president, the legislation lapses. Assengmented des Passage, The Assengmented, des Passage, The Assengmented, des Passage, des passage, The assigned, deshared, assault, desaje, assembly, asosted, des.
The Government of Tamil Nadu notified the 10 acts in the Government Gazette on Saturday, after the decision of the Supreme Court that was “considered” receiving assent.
‘The deadlines must be reconsidered’
The sentence cited a memorandum of the 2016 office by the MHA, which made “clear that a three -month timeline has been prescribed for the decision on the invoices reserved for the president.” The official added: “The deadlines decided by the court must also be reconsidered.”
The request for review in the Supreme Court must appear before the same JB Pardiwala Judges and Judge R. Mahadevan pronounced the verdict.
The Mha is the nodal ministry for processing and conveying at the end of Decision this Deviation, and deviation, and deviation, and deviation, and deviation, and deviation, and deviation, and deviation, and deviation, and deviation, and deviation, deviation, deviation, deviation, and deviation, and deviation, and deviation, deviation, deviation, and deviation, and deviation, and deviation, and deviation, and deviation, and deviation, and deviation of deviational.
Published – April 13, 2025 12:14 am isth
