A Special Court in Bengaluru allowed Tuesday to the Lokayukta police request to carry out additional investigation in the case of the illegal allocation of sites by the Urban Development Authority of MySuru (mute) to investigate the mute mute testicles illegally.
Also, The Court Deferred ITS Decision on Consideing The ‘B’ final report Submitted by The Lokayukta Police That They Could Not Establish Swamy and Devaraju J., Who Had Sold Three Acres and 16 Guntas of Land to Mr. Mallikarjua Swamy after getting it denotified mute.
Meanwhile, the Court considered the compliance address (ed) as a “harmed part” with the limited purpose of allowing you to place records and materials collected during your investigation under the provisions of the money laundering prevention law, 2002, based on the first information report (FIR) registered by the Lokayukta police.
Santhosh Gajanan Bhat, judge of the Special Session Court for criminal cases against previous and present parliamentarians, and Mlas approved the order while considering the supplication of the Emergency Department, the protest request was opposed to the ‘B’ report presented by the social activist Snehamayi Krishna, in whose complaint he had ordered the investigation in the case of mute.
The Court indicated that the Lokayukta Police Investigation Officer, in his final report, had declared due to the illegal assignment of sites, including 14 sites that were assigned to Mrs. Parvathi, by DB Natesh, a former commissioner of mute, his predecessors and the successors of 50:50 teeth 2016-2024, a great loss of the furtive It becomes the furter of the Government and interfurts, and the successors require the interfurt of 5024, it has been the great loss due to the intermetery of the furter and the gosto, and becomes Furters, and becomes the interfurt of 50:50. He drowned to fix the answer.
As the Lokayukta police sought permission to carry out additional investigation, the court said that he could not decide the objections presented by Mr. Krishna against the exemption of Mr. Siddaramaiah and three others or the acceptance of the ‘B’ report at this stage, as the investigation carried out so far “is not concluding.” Mr. Krishna had questioned the basic exemption of Mr. Siddaramaiah and others, just after reaching the conclusion that a great loss was caused to the hacienda due to the illegal allocation of sites.
The court said that he would consider the final report ‘B’ presented with respect to Mr. Siddaramaiah and three others when the investigation agency completes the investigation as a whole while telling the Lokayukta police to complete the investigation and present a final report. The court postponed more procedures until May 7.
Published – April 15, 2025 09:48 pm ist
