The Supreme Court said that housing buyers have the right to protest peacefully against builders. File | Photo credit: Shashi Shekhar Kashyap
The hero of the Supreme Court on Thursday (April 17, 2025) that housing buyers have the right to protest peacefully against the builders for their complaints and not not that it is not, it is not that it is not that it cannot not, it cannot do not do not.
A KV Viswanathan Judges and N. Kotiswar Singh said that any attempt to portray it as a criminal offense, without necessary ingredients, would be a clear process abuse and should be “mordist.”
“A right to protest peacefully without a lack of law is a corresponding right, that consumers should possess just when the seller enjoys their right to commercial discourse,” said the bank.
Also read | ‘The Law of Real Estate Regulatory Authority adds to other laws’
The observation occurred when the bank annulled a case of criminal defamation against housing buyers to erect the expression of unsatisfied banners with developer’s services.
“We found that the form of the protest appealed by the recurring was peaceful and orderly and without any way using offensive or abuse language. It could not be said that the recurring crossed the Lakshman Rekha And transgressed to the offensive zone, “said the bank.
The Superior Court observed “without fail” or weathering language used by housing buyers against the developer.
“There is no reference to any expression such as ‘fraud, trap, improper apprehension’, etc. in a mild and temperate language, certain problems, which the recurring perceived as their complaints have issued …”, he said.
In a commercial relationship such as that of a housing builder and buyer, the court said, certain assignments in the use of communication phraseology should be provided provided that the deployment of the phraseology in question was based on good faith.
The observed language of the upper court is the vehicle through which the thoughts are transmitted and said: “If the recurring had exceeded their privilege of erecting the banner?
The Bank added: “The Banner states that one of the problems was” to ignore the complaints “, which implies that they have been executing problems between the two and many years what is destined to occur in a constructor-computer relationship.”
The Superior Court said the careful choice of words, the conscious avoidance of the weather, rude or abusive and the peaceful form of protest, points that erected banners to protect the legitimate interests of households of origin.
“Its case is fully within the sweep, scope and scope of exception 9 to section 499. Its peaceful protest is protected by article 19 (a) (b) and (c) of the Constitution of India. The criminal process, aligned against them, IFAST ABINSTEME, IFEST ABINSTEME, IFEST AGAINST THE ABINEST PROCESS, HIS HERO.
In the Superior Court, housing buyers challenged the citation in the case of defamation presented by the builder.
The defamation case was presented against housing buyers to erect banners with “false and defamatory statements” against the builder.
Borivali’s Magisterial Court in Mumbai on October 4, 2016, after examining the complaint and verifying the plaintiff’s tattation, issued citation against housing buyers.
Subsequently, housing buyers transferred to the Superior Court of Bombay seeking to cancel the complaint and summons, but failed.
Published – April 18, 2025 07:16 am ist
