Close Menu
  • Home
  • India
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • CEO
    • Economy
    • Realtor
  • Entertainment
  • Festivals
  • Health
  • LifeStyle
    • Education
    • Technology
  • Sports
    • Coach
Indian News: Breaking Stories and TrendsIndian News: Breaking Stories and Trends
Wednesday, May 21
  • Home
  • India
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • CEO
    • Economy
    • Realtor
  • Entertainment
  • Festivals
  • Health
  • LifeStyle
    • Education
    • Technology
  • Sports
    • Coach
Indian News: Breaking Stories and TrendsIndian News: Breaking Stories and Trends
Home » Blog » Opposition claims Section 44(3) of Digital Personal Data Protection Act destroys RTI, seeks repeal

Opposition claims Section 44(3) of Digital Personal Data Protection Act destroys RTI, seeks repeal

Neha MalhotraBy Neha Malhotra India
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

(From the right) The leaders of the Block of India Priyanka chaturvedi, Gaurav Gogoi and Jhon Brittas are directed to the media in the Press Club of India, in New Delhi on April 10, 2025.

(From the right) The leaders of the India Block Priyanka chaturvedi, Gaurav Gogoi and Jhon Brittas are directed to the media in the Press Club of India, in New Delhi on April 10, 2025. Photo credit: Sushil Kumar Verma

The opposition of India Bloc in Thorsday (April 10, 2025) demanded the repeal of Section 44 (3) or the Digital Personal Data Protection Law (DPDP), arguing that it destroys the Law of Law to Information (RTI).

At a joint press conference in New Delhi, the leader of Congress, Guurav Gogoi, said that more than 120 parliamentarians of the block matches of India, including opposition leader Rahul Gandhi, have signed a joint memo for the repeal of this section and Vawini.

The press conference was attended by MM Abdulla (DMK), Priyanka chaturvedi (SHIV SENA-UBT), John Brittas (CPI-M), Javed Ali Khan (SP) and Naval Kishor (RJD).

Civil rights activists have opposed section 44 (3) of the DPDP Law that seeks to replace section 8 (1) (J) of Law RTI, 2005, said Mr. Gogoi.

Section 8 (1) (J) of the RTI Law allowed the retention of personal information if its dissemination was not related to any public activity or interest or would lead to an unjustified invasion of privacy.

However, this restriction was subject to an important safeguard: if the central public information officer, the State Public Information Officer or the Appeal Authority determined that disseminating the information attended a broader public interest, it could still be made aviaxable.

Section 44 (3) of the DPDP Law modifies section 8 (1) of the RTI Law that allows government agencies to retain “information related to personal information”, without consideration for the public interest or any other exception.

Published – April 10, 2025 4:17 PM IST

Keep Reading

ED arrests former UCO Bank chairperson for ‘diverting, siphoning’ funds worth over ₹6,000 crores

Singareni aims for 76 mt coal production this year, asks young officers to fit into future plans

Modi’s foreign trips did not help India when it needed global support, says Kharge

Realme partners with Aston Martin Formula One Team to launch GT 7 Dream Edition

Alphabet’s Waymo gets California nod for expansion in San Francisco Bay Area

Panel discussion held to seek justice for Rohingya refugees

India

  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Festivals
  • Health
  • Technology

Business

  • CEO
  • Economy
  • Realtor

Lifestyle

  • Education
  • Sports
  • Coach
  • Politics
©2017-2025 Indianupdates All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.