Saturday, April 26

A special court here has found “sufficient material to take the crime” against Veena Thaikandiyil, daughter of Prime Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, and 12 other accused in the cochin minerals and the case of the case of the Rutilo stages of the case case of case of case of case case of case

VPM Suresh Babu, District Judge and Additional Sessions, Ernakulam, ordered citing against Mrs. Veena and others on Friday.

The defendant will have to appear personally before the court on a scheduled date and request bail. The granting of the bond will be the discretion of the Court. The accused date of the accused will be set by the Court after the case is assigned a number, according to legal sources.

The case that involves Prime Minister’s daughter has triggered political agitation in the state, even when Mr. Vijayan tried to portray him as a movement that attacked him. While the opposition parties intensified their agitation agitation, the agitation of the CPI (m) -ldf government by qualifying it as a case of corruption, the CPI (m) tried to play it as a problem two private companies.

The court decided to have knowledge of the crime after “reading the complaint, the investigation report, the declaration of witnesses and documents produced by the Sfio.”

The judge tried the investigation report presented by the SFIO as a police report and ordered the procedures of the day.

The judge, who reviewed the report, the materials and documents produced by the investigation agency, concluded that they were sufficient materials to take into account the crime and the issuance process against all those accused of violation of the sections. Behavior.

The sections cover a large number of fraudulent acts, including my representation, concealment and position abuse to deceive or obtain an improper advantage.

Although Mrs. Veena has been prosecuted as the eleventh accused in the case, her signing of you now missing, Exalogic Solutions Private Limited, Karnataka, is the 12th drums. Sasidharan Kartha, managing director of the CMRL, is the first defendant and his son, Saran S. Kartha, the fourth accused in the case.

Public counters and CMRL P. Suresh Kumar, KS Suresh Kumar, Ka Saghsh Kumar and AK Marekrishnan have also prosecuted as accused in the court order. In addition to CMRL and Exalogic, three companies, namely, Nipuna International Private Limited, South Kalamassery, Sasja India Private Limited, Aluva and Empower India Capital Investments Private Limited, Erkulam, have also asized as defendants.

The Sfio had claimed that Mrs. Veena and her signature had resorted to “fraudulent payments” for a sum of ₹ 72.7 million rupees of the CMRL. The accusation against the CMRL was that the company showulent expenses of ₹ 182 million rupees under the appearance of sludge management positions and transport costs.

Mr. Sasidharan and the CMRL have accused Bone of paying a fraudulent commission of ₹ 13 million rupees, Anil Ananda Panicker, tenth accused in the case.

Exit mobile version