A seminar organized by the Telangana Education Commission raised objections to the implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, qualifying it as “ideologically promoted, fiscal and structurally flaved.”
“The false does not have LOCUS STANDI. Its content was discussed with state governments or debated in Parliament. It was simply approved by the Cabinet of the Union. He overlooked the Central Education Advisory Board (PUES), which did not binding it, ”said Professor Shantha Sinha, former president of the National Commission for the Protection of Child’s Rights.
“Politics emphasizes the result, does not recognize that the result cannot be achieved without the required entries. By changing the UG program from 3 years to 4 years with a multiple entry output system (pointing out that Postten’s benefit is not the SPRESGITIBILTIBILY G. Haragopal, former professor at Hyderab University.
Presiding over the Seminar, Akunuri Murali Ias (Retd.) President of the Telangana Education Commission, accused of being the first educational policy that aims to dismantle the public -funded education system. “Quality education cannot be promoted if the disbursement for school and higher education is so low. The educational disbursement of Telangana, for example, is only 1.5% of its GSDP, well below the global average or 4.48%,” said Mr. Murali.
“Policy recommendations will lead to acute and centralization marketing. Centralized income exams are another control point in terms of study and stratification programs,” said Kodandaram MLC.
The meeting reached a consensus that Nep 2020, in its current form, is not suitable for the diverse and unequal educational landscape of India.
Published – April 17, 2025 08:56 PM IST