The actor turned into a politician and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam President Vijay has challenged the constitutional validity of the WAQF legislation in the Supreme Court.
A BENCH HEADED by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna Will Hear on April 16 More than A Box Petions, Including One Filled By All India Majlis-E-Ttehadul Muslime (Aimim) Leader Asaduddin of Waisi, The Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution, The Constitution, the Constitution, the Constitution, the Constitution, the Constitution, the Constitution, the Constitution, the Constitution, the Constitution, the Constitution) the Constitution, the Constitutional call, 2025.
Also read | BJP will carry out ‘WAQF Reforma and public awareness campaign from April 20 to May 5
Beenijnes The CJI, Judge Sanjay Kumar and Judge KV Viswanathan are part of the Tres Judges bank to listen to the requests, Chord to the Apex Court website.
In addition to the plea of Mr. Owaisi, the Superior Court has figured to listen to requests presented by AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan, Association for the Protection of Civil Rights, Arshad Madani, Samastha Kerala Jamiathul Ulemla, Mohyab Khan Salmani Rjd leader Manoj Jha.
Some other requests have not yet been listed before the bank by the registration of the Apex court.
On April 8, the center presented a warning in the Apex court and sought a hearing before any order was approved in the matter.
One part is presented by the one in the higher courts and in the Apex court to ensure that orders are not approved without listening to it.
On April 8, the Government of the Union notified the WAQF Law (amendment), which recovered the consent of President Druguadi Murmu on April 5 after its approval in Parliament after heated debates in both chambers.
The legislation was approved in Rajya Sabha with 128 members voting in favor and 95 opposing it. He was authorized by Lok Sabha with 288 members who supported him and 232 against him.
The Muslim Personal Law Board of All India (AIMPLB), Jamiat Ulama-I-Hind, DMK, the parliamentarians of the Imran Pratapgarhi and Mohd Jaedwed Congress, and the ICC through its leader D Raja are other key petitioners.
The ruling DMK of Tamil Nadu has transferred to the main court through its deputy general secretary Raja and said in a statement: “Despite the generalized opposition, the Government of the WAQF amendment was approved by the government of the Union without adequate consideration of the objections raised by the members of the JPC (joint parliament of the Law of the Law of the Law. Rights of approximately 50 Muslims Lakh in Tamil Nadu and 20 million Muslims in other parts of the country.
In addition to political parties, Muslim bodies such as AIMPLB, Jamiat Ulama-Hind and Samastha Kerala Jamiathul Ulema -ule-Ana religious organization of Sunni Muslim academics and clergymen in Kerala-Have presented separate pleas on the upper court.
In a press release, AIMPLB spokesman SQR Ilyas said his request strongly opposed the amendments approved by Parliament for being “arbitrary, discriminatory and based on exclusion.”
The amendments, he said, not only violated the fundamental rights guaranteed under articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution, but also clearly revealed the intention of the government to take complete control over the administration of WAQF Mannority, leaving aside the swallow of the Itelinization of the Itallinity of the Itlimia. Itlimoing the Itlimoing the Itlimoing the iteling the iteling of the Iteling of the Iteling of the Iteling of the Iteling of the itelinizers of the Illimentation of the unliming endowments.
Articles 25 and 26 ensure freedom of conscience, the right to practice, propagate religion and the right to establish and administer institutions for religious and charitable purposes, he said.
The MP Jadders of Congress claimed that the law imposed “arbitrary restriction” to the properties of WAQF and its management, undermining the religious autonomy of the Muslim community.
In his separate plea, Aimim’s chief Owaisi said that the legislation moved away from WAQFs several protection granted to Waqfs, and Hindus, Jainists and Sijs, religious and charitable, both.
The Association for the Protection of Civil Rights, an NGO, has also challenged the constitutional validity of the law in the Superior Court.
Delhi Mla Khan of AAP has sought the law declared non-stitionable, for violation or “articles 14, 21, 25, 26, 29, 30 and 300-A of the Constitution.”
Published – April 13, 2025 11:51 pm isth