In fact, President Trump 2.0 is now inclined to claim his incomparable unippair hegemony that the United States enjoyed after the disappearance of the years of closing the duration of the USSR of the eighties. Here a question arises about whether or not the United States is interested in defending progressive liberal values and democratic traditions and also the security of the West, including the alliance of the North Atlantic Treaty (NATO), although Putine Putine is repeated. While Russian aggression on Ukraine has seriously in danger of peace and security not only of the Angloeuropean world, but also that of the world, the militaristic and imperialist expansions of Chinese that continue for many past decades are in danger and security and peace.
Why do Trump expect today from the considerably strong Moscow and Beijing, individually and their combined strength, both to facilitate American descent directed towards the lonely global hegemony? Putin or Xi Jinping don’t want to achieve the same supreme position in the world? So, is it feasible for the United States to ignore the economic or security groups of Europe by limiting its exclusive national interests? In fact, it can be a disaster if Trump 2.0 undermines the general collective power that includes the soft power of the West, where the Anglo -American spirit of liberalism and democracy and its collective vision with respect to global peace and security, socio -economic,
While the curious inclination for imperialist policies of yesteryear still attracts President Trump 2.0 to continue consolidating his global hegemony not suspended in the past, suffering cracks due to Russian and Chinese ancestry in international affairs and autocratic regimes of North Korea, the Hungary effect and Islamic such as Iran, Libanon E and Y Y. The imperist statements of the United States may until now maintained so far the silly Anglo-American silly American Toiton-American Teitned Teitson-American Teitened. Consolidate democracy through the world in general and the different liberal-democratic order of Europe in particular. The NATO alliance was launched in 1949 by the United States, Canada and several nations of Western Europe. One of the objectives of this great alliance was to promote democratic values, in addition to protecting the security and freedom of its members through political and military means. Fortunately, the United States, which suffers at least for the attacks of two world wars, quickly became the very desired dominant role of super power in the years of the Cold War after World War II, enjoying an unscatched and military economy.
Upon returning to the present time to the global rise, the Trump 2.0 administration in its attempt to obtain the long -awaited cessation of hostilities between Russia and Ukraine has seriously undermined the security and economic perspectives of Angloeurpears of the Angloeurus of the United States that are inclined to Russia and China. It can be deduced wisely that the United States is ready to leave Europe and its security concerns, since that is now reflected in its evolutionary modifications of foreign policy.
What Trump 2.0 and the associates have in mind is nothing less than restructuring modern capitalism that arose from the 1929 global economic crisis and solving the postwar international system directed by the United States. Therefore, there is a decrease in the West, since it no longer seems like a “west” liberal in terms that the world has a beaten bone to use the bright label that sells the postwar decades. Such a change in the Trump administration can damage the unity and force that the West and NATO also due to possible mutual disputes between the partners of the Alliance. That is why foreign policy and safety agreements under Trump 2.0, he witnesses a dramatic change away from the liberal-procressive direction so far superior, which thus covers the idological and strategic foundations of the US state and the intra-we big In fact, forced slapped of the sanctions to many national states, challenging the economic supremacy of the United States and the use of tariffs as a weapon, Trump 2.0 is becoming avengative to push the world towards the unipolar order dominated by the United States.
In this scenario, the attempt of President Trump to occupy Gaza and the mineral resources in Ukraine accompanied by the increase in the rates proposed on the states in Europe and beyond, they have baffled the European community, apart from India and other states with respect to fair trade practices and international commercial activities between them. The Renaissance of hegemonic capitalism and the supremacy of US national interests that are huge threaten the very core of liberal and democratic international standards, on thus contracting the world’s world unipolar once again the terravure of terratría and the signs of the presigrants and the presigrants of the presigrants and the signing presenter and presigrants and presigrants and presigrants and presigrants. INIGRE AND PRECEDENT PRESSURE. The arrogance of the 2.0 against India. And that reminds us about the fish of the American colonial perspective, à-vis new delhi, a junior partner in southern Asia, perhaps to counteract both and Pakistan against India despite openly proclaiming the opposite.
Therefore, the current international scenario urges the global community to join the rapid erosion of the cardinal values of the liberal, progressive and democratic international order that greatly characterized the Anglo -American International System of the West with the League of Consolidity Nations and subsequently the United Nations after the end of the IST and World War and its glorious The peace of peace, the principles of peace of peace “equality of national states”. This glorious canon in itself left the Peace Treaty of Westfalia, 1948, thus training the Balcanization of Europe and establishing a solid durable peace base in Europe. They must also explore a pro-people alternative that challenges capitalism of exploitation in different forms and the United States led the passion for gross imperialism sliding and even repudiating the interests of the West and NATO, which leads to the wave of a unipolar world order.
Discharge of responsibility
The opinions expressed above are the author’s own.
End of the article
